dream of a halt and a swithcman
15 - 18 May 2021
V.Smirnov and K. Sorokin Foundation Studios, Moscow, Russia
dream of a halt and a swithcman
15 - 18 May 2021
V.Smirnov and K. Sorokin Foundation Studios, Moscow, Russia
artists:
Kirill Makarov, Dmitry Kadintsev
prefrase by Dmitry Kadintsev:
the dream of a halt and a switchman
the chirping of the grasshoppers ahead
no train whistle can be heard
day ding
between the two trumpet sockets
flugelhorn and trumpet together with semaphore prepare to give a signal
hump a handful
pea
swirling in the air
air
view of the exhibition
2021
text by K. Kononenko:
For the new exhibition in the Foundation's workshops, Kirill Makarov and Dmitry Kadyntsev, without agreeing on a theme in advance,used the shared space of the workshop as the theme itself. By exploring the idea of space, exposing itIn exploring thought in its inner quality as a space for experimentation, the artists exhibit works on thought aboutpractices of coexistence in the contemporary world. This question of method and work in the absence of any predetermined connection is posed by the artists in the context of the coexistence of different kinds of writing in the same territory; it is posed by them in terms of modal logic, in a reflection on a common space that was once called by André Leroy Gueron the perimeter of safety". Where formal logic is organised as the opposition of object-existing verities, and non-modal logics operate essentially only one modality - existential, giving the objects of analysis and their names a common status of existence,Artists engage modal logical relations involving the embedding of judgements, considering the fact that reality itself and its assumption in thought exist in different modes. And it is precisely these modes, implemented in pictorial practice, that are presented by Makarov and Kadyntsev under the general title “The Dream of a Halt and a Switchman.”
The question of exploring reality as multidimensional in its indivisible wholeness, which is essentially the question of the modern civilisation about overcoming the entropy of the Anthropocene is present in the works of both artists in different invariants. Whereas Dmitry Kadyntsev's work explores the question of transition and recreation, which inevitably arises in alienated labour, Kirill Makarov reflects on the existence of bodies as boundaries in the world and the preservation of the enigma of these bodies as an opportunity for a peaceful experience of subjectivity in the longing and anxiety of the modern eye for spectacle.
For Kadyntsev, the expression of the hybrid space of reality in painting is resolved through "modulations," and the most Kadyntsev's expression of the hybrid space of reality in painting is resolved through "musical modulations", the transition from one tonality to another. Its essence is that from one system of tonal functions and gravitation, the musical development passes into another system, falling into the zone of attraction of another tonic. Such a modulation can be compared to the transition to another "territory" where the harmonic laws are the same, but they are governed by a different tonic centre. This meaning is close to the meaning of the term "transition module" in mathematics, and describes well the exposition of an imaginary resting space,created by Dmitry, where the slightly discernible images of step, movement and hesitation are expressed by the discontinuity of lines, the mutual displacement of webs and the freshness of pure tones.
Dream of a halt and a swithcman
oil on canvas, 164 x 235 cm, 2021
In the only painting by Kirill Makarov presented at the exhibition we see an abundance of details, a displacement of plans, a subtlety of colours, a multiplicity and intertwining of colour axes. This painting, with its size, saturation and coherence referring to tapestries, allows the eye to freely glide over the bodies of carefully painted people, meanwhile smuggling in reflections on redefining borders and modes of coexistence. In Kirill Makarov's painting this kind of visual language is written out as a correspondence to the main distinguishing feature of multiple modal logics - the formation of a signifying perspective inwards. In speech, in the flow of words, symbols and signs, in a civilization consumed by the production of images, the object of art has to be and becomes an actor of the cut, allowing to go beyond binary logic and turn to spatial perception.
The philosopher Bernard Stiegler suggests that everything local is nonentropic, and in this sense, Makarov's localized writing of the new place and knowledge, assembled in virtual space from fragments of experience of being with others, becomes a writing of the possible, of the accidental, of the necessary. According to the art critic and philosopher M.-J. Mosen, the image, in contrast to the sign, does not have its opposite, and modal logics appear in Makarov’s painting as as writing that maintains a logical distance in relation to objects and works on their inner qualities.
The common space of the exhibition, offended by the painting of Makarov and Kadyntsev, seems to remind us that the production of an image is not an addition, a new component of the system, but exists as a primary structure of the system itself, which allows us to carry out constitutive acts of division and delimitation. Painting, rather than being yet another element of the familiar, creates the very possibility of the emergence of new elements and thus reveals itself in its own truly liberating guise.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/55ef8/55ef8faa374237541ee532d0e69b50ff2ac69650" alt=""